Archive for May, 2012

Have you ever wanted to start a business? Have you ever wanted to strike out on your own in the journey to financial independence? Well I have been on the sidelines long enough and I am about to make it happen and after reading this blog post you will be inspired to make your dream happen to.

I have decided to start a freelance writing service and here is why: Writing is my passion. Not only that but I would have to say that over the years I have become very skilled at it. This passion and skill that I have is in great need as I began to notice there are so many businesses and individuals in need of good clear simple writing. So there is the formula for starting your own business: Your passion+Other’s need=business.

Now there is a lot more to it than that but the basics are there that can push you past the dead work. Oh yes there will be plenty of dead work. Details to be sorted out. Logistics to be handled. And speaking of logistics, Can you help me name my business? I have already brainstormed some options. Which ones do you like best?

R.L. Wordsmith

Fast Type Communications

Crank It Out Writing

Knockout Communications

Down to Earth Writing

Simply Words

Words that Sell

Ready Set Type

Excited to hear any suggestions. Oh yeah and if you are inspired to finally start your business or you already have a business let me know. I would love to support you and e mutually inspired by your endeavors.

Peace,

Side note: Mayo Family update

It’s been a while since I let folks know what’s going on with us since our move. Well here is a quick update:

Pittsburgh: We love the Burgh and have been here long enuff that it feels like home. In fact we are looking into buying a home here and have been looking for the past few months. Please pray that we find a company that will give us approval for a loan (we have found a house that is just right for us)

Kaydon: Kaydon is growing like a weed and is now potty training. It took him some time but he was motivated by being able to one day go camping with Dad. He has grown to be more verbal and has made many new friends.

Syenna: Cc is fascinated with princesses and enjoys watching The Princess and the Frog. She is very talkative and constantly adding to her vocabulary.

Yvette: Yvette is now a Jazzercise instructor and has had a full plate with taking care of the kids and her new instructor gig. She is also bringing back the lost art of letter writing. Check out her blog

Ramon: I recently completed my goals of losing 20 lbs and going on my first backpacking trip. It was amazing and I have a new sense of awe and wonder at nature and creation. I even started my own taxonomic record of all the species that I saw. The downer to the trip was that I got extremely sick and found out that I had stomach ulcers. The GI doctor put me on a strict diet and gave me some medicine so they should be healing nicely. My follow up is tomorrow.

What’s next??? Well I am currently working at Trader Joe’s but I am starting to really dig into the passion that I have for writing and will be submitting articles to various magazines as well as working on a few ebook projects. In the meantime I will continue posting on my blog and in the coming months will steer the discussion towards matters of faith and theology.

So that’s us in a nutshell. Stay tuned for more Mayo adventures :)

20120530-201139.jpg

Confession: When it comes to characters in the Bible that I admire I would have to say it’s David hands down. The passion for God, the ability to give bears, lions, and giants a good thrashin, and his amazing leadership are all something I want to emulate. But most of all it’s his authenticity with God and with people that makes him one of my favorites. That being said when I answer the question: who in the Bible am I most like? I would have to say Jacob. The liar. The manipulator. The deceiver. The supplanter. Now in my younger days it was boldfaced streaking in the park lies. Outright lies that were clearly black and white but later on I acquired a new skill. I learned how to manipulate people with my words, to give an appearance of truth. To avoid actual lying by nodding my head, using the right language, or by not saying anything at all. I learned how to be inauthentic. I learned to act like everything was ok when I was furiously raging inside (pastors are good at this). I learned to give the impression that I liked certain things just to get along and keep relationships peaceful (wives hate this). By doing all that I actually made things worse for myself and for others. Over the past few years I have been in the pursuit of living an authentic WYSIWYG life and it has been joyful and heart wrenching to reach for such a lofty goal.

The Ideal: When it comes to authenticity someone greater than David comes to mind-Jesus. Looking at the Gospels we get a close up glimpse of a life of integrity. Jesus pulled no punches whether he was addressing Pharisees, political figures, or prostitutes. He was always the same and those around him never had to guess what he was about or his feelings towards them. He truly lived a WYSIWYG life.

WYSIWYG is an acronym in the computer world for What You See Is What You Get. It describes a system in which the content you have been editing closely resembles the finished product. So instead of a lot of code you mostly get the content. That’s the way I want to live my life. How about you?

The Remedy: Like me, your life may closely resemble Jacob’s or his grandfather Abraham’s (the guy lied and said his wife was his sister just to save his own neck) and not the life of David or Jesus. The question then becomes How do I live an authentic WYSIWYG life? Here are a couple of suggestions:

Silence and solitude

Go off to the park or even the mountains. Get away to some secluded place and begin to sense who you are in God’s eyes. Most of our inauthenticity comes from an unhealthy attachment to people and detachment from God. Being in solitude and silence gives us time to be ourselves. You can’t get more authentic than that.

Root yourself in the love of God

Closely related to what was said above is rooting ourselves in the love of God. In the book of Ephesians Paul writes:

For this reason I bow my knees before the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named, that according to the riches of his glory he may grant you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit in your inner being, so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith—that you, being rooted and grounded in love, may have strength to comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God. (Ephesians 3:14-19 ESV)

Memorize and meditate on scripture that speaks of God’s love for you. Personalize it. Why? Most of our inauthenticity is motivated by an unhealthy hunger for the “love” of others. When we are rooted in God’s love we know the love of others is false and cannot be relied on and we can trust that our authentic self is forever loved by God.

Take action

Do something you have always wanted to do but fear has held you back. Each time that fear held you back your authentic self went into a corner to hide. It’s time to bring him or her out. Whatever that thing is stop making excuses and take action! Whether it’s learning to do martial arts or getting on stage and performing or asking that girl out face your fears and your authentic self will come shining through.

So there is my confession and hopefully some good tips for all of you fellow travelers on the journey to an authentic WYSIWYG life.

What about you, Do you have any other tips on how to become a truly authentic person?

Continuing our series on Defining racism in the 21st century is Steven Hamilton. He and a few others from Marycommunity’s I expand the kingdom through a community of faith in Pittsburgh, Pa. You can find his musings on theology and the church on his blog Verve and Verse

So without further adieu….

The Devil Does Business at the Crossroads

There is a postscript to the myth that at the crossroads where blues-legend Robert Johnson made his pact with the devil, Robert all ready possessed the sound that caused the strings on his guitar to vibrate, hum, and sing with a sound dark and blue, those beautiful, soulful chords and notes. The devil took advantage of something that was all ready happening and deceived Robert in the bargain. I think as we wrestle with the question Ramon has proposed, What is racism in the 21st century?, we are again in possession of something stirring deep in our collective souls that we need to trust to emerge with our intention rather than striking a deal with the devil.

When President Obama was elected in 2008, some of the initial talk moved toward saying that America was ‘post-racial’ and that race didn’t matter. Of course, as one Op-Ed from the New York Times pleads: “Race is like weather, we only talk about it when it’s extreme, but it’s always there.”

So, given this, what is racism in 21st century America? For myself, I’m always trying to ask the deeper question beyond the question or at least a clarifying question, so what do we mean by ‘racism’?

In their book, Divided by Faith: Evangelical Religion and the Problem of Race in America, Michael Emerson and Christian Smith present the case that racial categories are socially constructed and thus, the social construct built to preference one race and discriminate against another allocates different economic, social, political and psychological rewards along racial lines. They say, “a racialized society is a society wherein race matters profoundly for differences in life experiences, life opportunities and social relationships.”

If racial categories are socially constructed, can’t we just de-construct and move on? Like our friend from the NYTimes Op-Ed piece, I don’t think so. This is an important undercurrent in America, and I believe the devil is busy doing business at the current cultural, ethnic, and racial crossroads. But let’s not take the devil’s deal that takes advantage of us and the issue. Let’s embrace the road toward a cruciform-shaped authenticity and reconciliation as our point of divergence. Race does matter, and it matters profoundly. But what if it matters differently than we suppose? What-if, we aren’t supposed to be color-blind? What-if the messy and complex in-breaking of God’s alternate reality embraces race and ethnicity beyond our ways of lowest-common-denominator?

[Anyone an old comic book collector in their youth like me? Remember the 'What-If' series from Marvel Comics? "The stories in this initial, 47-issue series (Feb. 1977 - Oct. 1984) utilized the alien Uatu the Watcher as narrator. The observer of events transpiring on Earth from his base on the moon, Uatu, a member of an immortal race of Watchers, is also able to observe what transpires in alternate realities. The What If stories usually began with Uatu briefly recapping a notable event in the mainstream Marvel Universe. He then indicated a particular point of divergence in that event, and demonstrated what would have happened if events had taken a different course from then.]

In an engaging way, James Chuong wrestles with our ‘what-if’ point of divergence in light of the touchstone of scripture:

Ethnicity Matters from InterVarsity twentyonehundred on Vimeo.

There is a great statue in Washington, DC that I often stop in the shade of and reflect on what it says. Chiseled at eye level is the phrase: What is Past is Prologue.

Can we listen together and search for the signs for the way forward at the crossroads of the 21st century America? The biblical move doesn’t ‘dumb-down’ our engagement and reconciliation, but rather ‘raises-up’ our engagement and asks that in owning our past, we wade into the messiness of our differences and all the misunderstandings and aching, unbelievable beauty there is in each of us, so that we can sing the blues together as we travel, in the words of Samuel Hines, reconciliation as a way of life.

Hmmm….

What would it look like to own the past (which is prologue) while at the same time look for a way forward?

How can we “reconciliation a way of life”?

How does race matter in your life?

Same sex marriage. Hmmm…..So I resisted approaching this topic for a while. I was hesitant to write about it in a public form not just because it’s controversial (it definitely is) but more because I have not truly come to a fully articulated stance concerning the issue and also because it is so complex. Most people approach it only from a spiritual or political perspective when it actually touches on both areas. It definitely needs a more nuanced perspective than “It’s wrong” or “because the Bible says so” or “as long as two people are happy”.

So instead of posting my hardened conviction I would rather ask you to join me in asking the hard questions. I also must say that these questions are not exhaustive and may actually provoke more questions. So let’s dive in……

Biblical

From a Biblical standpoint I do not want to ask what scripture says of homosexual practice but what scripture calls us as believers to in regards to political power, the church’s relationship with the outside world, and the church’s calling. Here are some questions I have been asking:

Did Jesus address homosexual behavior or identity in the gospels?

How did Paul address homosexuality within the Roman Empire?

Would Jesus or Paul focus on the definition of marriage for the wider society?

Political

One missing dimension from the Christian side of the debate is the political.

Have we considered the type of government we have and what that entails when it comes to this issue?

How should we vote and think about this issue in a secular democracy (contrary to popular belief we are not a “Christian nation” whatever that means)?

Since we are a secular democracy what can we expect from our president, congressmen, and supreme court judges on this matter?

Historical

We also need to be asking how history plays a role in this.

Has the church ever attempted to legislate morality? What were the results?

Have we always historically owned the right to define and perform marriages in the public square?

How do the lessons from the civil rights movement influence our decisions on same sex marriage?

Practical /Experiential

Finally there is the praxis or the things that grab us on an experience level.

What do we say to those who identify as homosexual?

What will it do to our witness as the church if we ignore the issue?

What will it do to our witness if we denounce same sex unions?

What will it do to our witness if we endorse same sex unions?

I think that one of the things I constantly fail at as a follower of Jesus is listening and asking questions (things that were consistently practiced by Jesus). I personally believe that Obama’s recent endorsement of same sex marriage has provoked a lot of knee jerk reactions and not enough prayer and wisdom. For those who are followers of Jesus I ask that you join me in wrestling and seeking God’s will in relation to this issue.

Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, making the best use of the time, because the days are evil. Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. (Ephesians 5:15-17 ESV)

Any questions that you would like to add?

We have been going through a series on “Defining Racism in the 21st Century” where I have asked for guest posts from caucasian bloggers who have chosen to engage with race as an issue (I believe this is important since in this country Caucasians have the privilege of ignoring or minimizing these issues).

So here is our next post from Steve Shenk the pastor of the Buffalo Vineyard Church. You can also find Steve blogging at Damascus 9 where he writes on issues related to the church, the culture, and theology. So without further adieu:

Racism in 21st century America is real. It is a problem. However, it is no longer the problem that it once was; it has changed into a different sort of problem. More specifically, our society has moved from categorizing people on the basis of their skin color, to categorizing people based on class.

This doesn’t mean that people no longer engage in racism in its purer form, but rather that, as a society, we have moved a few steps away from racial discrimination, and towards a different form of discriminatory practice. There are, of course, plenty of counter-examples of discrimination based purely on race. Generally, however, our society has come to view this kind of behavior as inappropriate.

Also, this doesn’t mean that people of different races are treated equally, they aren’t, but rather that the reasons for the discrimination are significantly different. Ethnic minorities are treated differently by our society, but, in large part, they aren’t treated differently because they are ethnic minorities. Ethnic minorities are treated differently because they are largely more impoverished, less educated, and belonging to a ‘lower-class’ cultural group. The discrimination is toward the class; the class is proportionally tilted towards ethnic minorities.

This is what is commonly known as ‘structural racism.’ Individuals may not be acting out of racist motives, but the system obviously does not treat all races equally. Statistics bear out that different ethnic groups exist in very different circumstances with respect to incarceration rates, education rates, literacy rates, employment rates, etc. This is so, not primarily, because people today treat different races differently, but because of the legacy of historic racism upon minority communities.

It is this shift that is behind the ‘multi-culturalism’ seen amongst younger generations. When people of diverse ethnic groups share a common socio-economic status, they actually have more in common culturally than they do with others of their own ethnic group. It is common enough to see ‘multi-cultural churches’ that are full of young, professional, middle-class, city-dwellers. The only problem is that they aren’t multi-cultural. They are indeed multi-ethnic, but they are also mono-cultural.

So this is where the rubber meets the road: we have become willing to accept people of other races into our circles, so long as they “aren’t like other white people,” or “aren’t like other black people,” etc. We pride ourselves on our acceptance, but we haven’t really dealt with the heart issue of loving our neighbors (or our enemies). We have friends of other ethnicities, but we are scared of people from the projects, or the trailer park, or the suburb, or the condo.

It is not black and white that need to come together, but rather it is the dividing wall of hostility that need to be abolished, wherever that wall might be. It is the impulse to divide, the impulse to alienate, the impulse to pull away from what is difficult, and to shrink back from what is different; that must be brought to the Cross of Jesus and left to die, so that His life can be birthed in us. If we make the issue about race, then we have missed the point of the parable of the Good Samaritan. Jesus’ point to the lawyer is precisely this; the ‘neighbor’ whom we must love is exactly that person we are trying to avoid being a neighbor to. The lawyer had someone in mind when he asked Jesus, “just who is my neighbor?” We all have someone in mind when we ask this question. “Surely, Lord, you don’t mean this person? …or that group?” The parable of the Good Samaritan says back, “Yes! that is precisely the person I mean! …that is precisely the group you must be a neighbor to!”

If we are to become the people God intends, then we are required to live cross-culturally, in precisely the cross-cultural relationships that we find the most distasteful. Whether that be the poor, the illiterate, the rich, the mentally ill, the sacrilegious, the businessman, the soccer-mom, the liberal, the conservative, the Roman Catholic, the Fundamentalist, the black, or the white. If we would call ourselves His apprentices, we must, indeed, learn to love even our enemies

So what do you think?

Is class a greater hurdle than race?

If class is greater than race do we ignore the legacy of historical racism??

Can a highly secularized society such as ours live out the Christlike ideal of loving our enemy? How?

I have been noticing something in myself lately. In so many ways I am judgmental. On an everyday basis I judge people. Sometimes it’s who they are. Sometimes it’s their actions. Sometimes it’s both.

Recently I’ve noticed a trend in social media of sharing videos of girls in the hood fighting and beating on one another. When I first noticed one of these videos in my newsfeed I immediately wanted to watch it and I almost did except I did not want to sign up for another fb application (that’s a whole other blog post). After I skipped watching the video I noticed two things about myself in that moment:

1) I was so in need of a cheap laugh that I was going to watch two girls fighting on home video

2) Secretly I thought “I am better than those girls. So glad that I am not like them or hang with people like them.”

Immediately I was convicted. I began to see how my use of terms like skank, hood rat, ghetto, tacky, and the new one “ratchet” were full of judgment, self righteousness, and hypocrisy. I began to see that my passing along and sharing pictures that humiliated those living in poverty was Pharasaical and proud.

The new word is “ratchet” and while we may laugh at young women who are labeled “ratchet” and talk about those who wear prom dresses that are ratchet I wonder who Jesus would hang out with if he were on earth today?

Echoes of that same phrase “So glad that I am not like them or hang with people like them” were on the lips of the Pharisee in Luke 18:11-12:

The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed thus: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.’ (Luke 18:11, 12 ESV)

The opposite prayer is spoken by the tax collector. If the Jews of 1st century Palestinr considered anyone to be “ratchet” it was these guys. They were looked down on as collaborators with the Roman empire, cheats, thieves, and even murderers.

The tax collector in Luke 18:13-14:

But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ I tell you, this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” (Luke 18:13-14 ESV)

Jesus chose to hang with prostitutes, tax collectors, and sinners. We choose to hold them in contempt and use them for a cheap laugh. The truth is many of us who are Christians and aligned with the establishment would have been passed up by Jesus. He would have passed us up in favor of the ghetto, the tacky, the ratchet. He would have been right at home with those who “have no hometrainin and can’t get themselves together”. Why? Jesus was labeled as well. What do you think Nathaniel meant by the question “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” (John 1:46 ESV)

So before you click on that video or website for a cheap thrill or momentary feeling of superiority remember this: Jesus loves the ratchet!

Here is the first installment of our series “Defining Racism in the 21st Century” written by Katelin Hansen who consistently serves up good thought provoking posts on the relationship between Christianity and race at her blog By Their Strange Fruit Here we go…….

Modern racism is more subtle than it used to be. The foolish will get confused about the difference, and think that racism doesn’t exist anymore. Although we don’t sit in different parts of the movie theater anymore, we now constantly breathe in the smog of racism that Beverly Tatum describes: sometimes it is so thick it is visible, other times it is less apparent, but always, day in and day out, we are breathing it in.” (Tatum, 2007)

Dr. Tatum does not characterize racism as overt discrimination or individual acts of hate. Rather, she defines it as one’s benefiting from a system of privileges based on race that is subtly ingrained in the surrounding culture, making it difficult to detect. In this sense, all white people are racist; we benefit from this system of privileges. It is possible for people of color to be prejudiced on the basis of race, but the social system is never in their favor.

Does an act of racism require the ‘intent to hurt’? Is hatred a prerequisite? Need it be large blatant acts, or do small insults (both conscious and unconscious) accumulate to establish a larger culture of problems and inequality?

Racism is not just about our prejudices or how we actively treat one another. It is about who holds the power in an institutionalized system that rewards some skin colors over others. It is within this racialized world that people of color are paid less for the same work, hired less often with the same resume, incarcerated longer for the same crime, charged more for the same mortgage. All of these problems are related to an underlying system that favors whiteness over blackness.
One of the characteristics of the post-jim crow era is that our 21st-century racism is subtle, insidious, and therefore terribly difficult to combat. It is no longer about public shows of discrimination or of individual violent anomalies that have now (for the most part) become socially unacceptable. More pervasive now is the constant bombardment of exhausting microaggressions : “brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults to the target person or group.” (Sue et al., 2007)

It can be difficult for white folks to appreciate the magnitude, impact, and burden of the accumulated daily prejudices over a person’s lifetime. How much extra energy do have in your life to deal with the sales clerk that follows you around the store as you shop for clothes, the taxi that passes you by for someone with lighter skin, the professor that assumes you came from a bad high school? Furthermore, it is from the accumulation of microagressions, that larger cultural and systematic racism arises (wage disparity, housing discrimination, judicial prejudice).

Dr. Tatum also compares modern racism to a moving sidewalk: “because racism is so ingrained in the fabric of American institutions, it is easily self-perpetuating. All that is required to maintain it, is business as usual…[when] people do not disrupt unfair systems of privilege, they are—willingly or unwillingly—on the moving sidewalk, receiving White privilege and inadvertently enabling racism.” (Tatum, 2007) When white folk realize the advantages we have, we may think more carefully about how we use our privilege to rectify the situations of those burdened with racism, to walk against the ‘moving sidewalk’ of privilege.

Questions

Does this change your perspective on racism in the 21st century?

Have you ever been on the receiving end of microaggressions?

In what ways are you able to perceive the “moving sidewalk of white privilege”?

I am going to be doing something a bit different here in the next couple of weeks. One of the advantages of the Internet is that not only can you give voice to your own thoughts and opinions for millions to view but it also gives you the opportunity to connect to other voices which you may be geographically separated from. Throughout this month I will be exploring the topic of racism through the guest posts of some fellow bloggers who I have connected with over the last few years. I chose them because they are thoughtful and intelligent and they come from a different backgrounds than myself: They are all European American. I did this intentionally in order to give voice to those who have the option to avoid the topic but instead dive into it with wisdom, humility, and solidarity.

The second reason I chose them is because of a problem that I have been seeking to untangle. I have heard a lot of people say that racism is over and since MLK Jr. marched and Obama is president we should leave it in the past. I think the problem with this line of thought is that it ignores the power of an “ism”. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his life fighting against racism, classism, and materialism. That’s so much bigger than getting to sit anywhere you want on a bus or at a restaurant. As I have said in earlier posts the problem with “isms” is that they take on a life of their own. They are much more powerful and pervasive than the spaces they inhabit. Kind of reminds me of Paul’s letter to the Ephesian church where he writes:

For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. (Ephesians 6:12 ESV)

I believe that these “isms” are spiritual forces and if that is the case we need to know how to fight it and we also need to know when we have actually won. Take racism for instance:

It’s everywhere. From our political bumper stickers to our
hockey to our movies . Racism is all around us.

It’s institutionalized. It’s not just in people’s hearts. It is very much a part of our institutions. This country was built on it and many (like my First Nation brothers and sisters) are still paying the price.

So many questions come to mind when we think of engaging racism:

Does developing personal relationships change it? Some would say that it doesn’t matter if you can say “some of my best friends are black”

Does regulating institutions change it? We have “regulated” everything but people’s hearts.

Where do we go from here?

I believe the first thing that we need to be aware of is the power of words. The words we use in our everyday speech carry the power of racism. Let’s just take the word ghetto for example. It once was used for the enclosed neighborhoods primarily resided in by Jews. Then it morphed to be a noun used for the inner city, crime ridden, impoverished areas inhabited by African Americans. Somewhere along the way this noun became not only an adjective but a negative adjective.

For example:


“That’s so ghetto”

“He drives a ghetto-$&@!? car”

“You know you ghetto when…”

It has become a negative adjective associated with an aspect of African American life and culture. How do you think it affects the minds of young kids growing up in the hood who use this word to describe thugs negatively? How do you think using this word shapes the minds of people from other ethnicities? This is the power of words.

In the next few weeks I will feature guest posts that attempt to define racism in the 21st century. I don’t know how to fight an “ism” but I believe this is a good place to start.