We have been going through a series on “Defining Racism in the 21st Century” where I have asked for guest posts from caucasian bloggers who have chosen to engage with race as an issue (I believe this is important since in this country Caucasians have the privilege of ignoring or minimizing these issues).
So here is our next post from Steve Shenk the pastor of the Buffalo Vineyard Church. You can also find Steve blogging at Damascus 9 where he writes on issues related to the church, the culture, and theology. So without further adieu:
Racism in 21st century America is real. It is a problem. However, it is no longer the problem that it once was; it has changed into a different sort of problem. More specifically, our society has moved from categorizing people on the basis of their skin color, to categorizing people based on class.
This doesn’t mean that people no longer engage in racism in its purer form, but rather that, as a society, we have moved a few steps away from racial discrimination, and towards a different form of discriminatory practice. There are, of course, plenty of counter-examples of discrimination based purely on race. Generally, however, our society has come to view this kind of behavior as inappropriate.
Also, this doesn’t mean that people of different races are treated equally, they aren’t, but rather that the reasons for the discrimination are significantly different. Ethnic minorities are treated differently by our society, but, in large part, they aren’t treated differently because they are ethnic minorities. Ethnic minorities are treated differently because they are largely more impoverished, less educated, and belonging to a ‘lower-class’ cultural group. The discrimination is toward the class; the class is proportionally tilted towards ethnic minorities.
This is what is commonly known as ‘structural racism.’ Individuals may not be acting out of racist motives, but the system obviously does not treat all races equally. Statistics bear out that different ethnic groups exist in very different circumstances with respect to incarceration rates, education rates, literacy rates, employment rates, etc. This is so, not primarily, because people today treat different races differently, but because of the legacy of historic racism upon minority communities.
It is this shift that is behind the ‘multi-culturalism’ seen amongst younger generations. When people of diverse ethnic groups share a common socio-economic status, they actually have more in common culturally than they do with others of their own ethnic group. It is common enough to see ‘multi-cultural churches’ that are full of young, professional, middle-class, city-dwellers. The only problem is that they aren’t multi-cultural. They are indeed multi-ethnic, but they are also mono-cultural.
So this is where the rubber meets the road: we have become willing to accept people of other races into our circles, so long as they “aren’t like other white people,” or “aren’t like other black people,” etc. We pride ourselves on our acceptance, but we haven’t really dealt with the heart issue of loving our neighbors (or our enemies). We have friends of other ethnicities, but we are scared of people from the projects, or the trailer park, or the suburb, or the condo.
It is not black and white that need to come together, but rather it is the dividing wall of hostility that need to be abolished, wherever that wall might be. It is the impulse to divide, the impulse to alienate, the impulse to pull away from what is difficult, and to shrink back from what is different; that must be brought to the Cross of Jesus and left to die, so that His life can be birthed in us. If we make the issue about race, then we have missed the point of the parable of the Good Samaritan. Jesus’ point to the lawyer is precisely this; the ‘neighbor’ whom we must love is exactly that person we are trying to avoid being a neighbor to. The lawyer had someone in mind when he asked Jesus, “just who is my neighbor?” We all have someone in mind when we ask this question. “Surely, Lord, you don’t mean this person? …or that group?” The parable of the Good Samaritan says back, “Yes! that is precisely the person I mean! …that is precisely the group you must be a neighbor to!”
If we are to become the people God intends, then we are required to live cross-culturally, in precisely the cross-cultural relationships that we find the most distasteful. Whether that be the poor, the illiterate, the rich, the mentally ill, the sacrilegious, the businessman, the soccer-mom, the liberal, the conservative, the Roman Catholic, the Fundamentalist, the black, or the white. If we would call ourselves His apprentices, we must, indeed, learn to love even our enemies
So what do you think?
Is class a greater hurdle than race?
If class is greater than race do we ignore the legacy of historical racism??
Can a highly secularized society such as ours live out the Christlike ideal of loving our enemy? How?
Great post Steve. I think class-discrimination has always been attached to racism, but now it is more of an acceptable type of discrimination than racism is (like you already stated). However, I will say that class is a greater hurdle than race because of it being less obvious. Its easier to point the foolery involved with treating someone lesser simply because of their race, than it is to point out the same, if not greater level of foolery that is involved with giving this treatment because of their class.
Case in point, the whole Trayvon Martin tragedy. I dont necessarily think that George Zimmerman killed martin out of racial hatred, but I do think that Zimmerman’s treatment was more gracious based on the fact that he was not African American and not in a poorer community. I am 27, around the same age as Zimmerman, and I believe 100% that if I killed someone because they looked suspicious to me, I would be blogging from Prison right now.
However, I was convicted when I read in your post about the whole ‘who is my neighbor?’ question, because in spite of what I have witnessed and encountered, growing up in Watts, South Central, and West LA, I have discriminatory tendencies myself toward those of lesser status than myself. Im reminded of David when he says, “They have all turned aside, together they have become corrupt; There is no one who does good, not even one” (Psalms 14:3).
Jason,
It is hard for me to say whether class is a greater hurdle to overcome than race. I believe they are so intertwined in the public eye but the reality is far from being that clear cut. For instance here in Allegheny county and also in West Virginia, and Ohio I see Afams and Euro Americans on food stamps. Our popular notion of welfare recipients all being single black mothers is just not true. But it is still used as political leverage to manipulate people into voting for their interests and against their “enemy” who is “taking all of their hard earned money”.
On the other hand, class is a greater hurdle in this country because of the “land of opportunity” rhetoric. The belief is that whatever socioeconomic bracket you are in it is because of your hard work or lack of it.
Btw Did u know most industrial farmers in America get govt checks and only work 50 days in the year on their farms?
Hey Mayo,
I call class a greater struggle because it has always been a struggle since ancient times up to the present. Race hasn’t (correct me if Im wrong). And even today, I know of many African Americans who discriminate over class more than I know those who are racist. And the same for Caucasians and others. However, I will agree that these two are intertwined, and sometimes interchangeable perspectives. They both still exist in a bold way, and I hate to say it, but they always will in this age. What can we do in addition to blogging (which is great), but what other ways can we impact our communities for change in both of these areas.
(No I didnt know that last fact about the farmers. Interesting…)
I think you are right. Classism is more prevalent because it taps into something more fundamentally human: possessing a certain amount of resources. The age old battle of the haves and have nots. Racism was just a tool to get more resources.
The first thing that comes to mind to change this kind of thing is educating folks. Also actually serving the poor and letting the poor serve us. Creating space to be the beloved community where there is no rich and poor….only citizens of the kingdom. That’s off the top of my head but I am going to explore those issues in another series
Creating the ‘beloved community’ is exactly the move we need to take. Stepping into table fellowship with those who confuse us, bother us, disagree with us, or misunderstand us, is demanded by the gospel. It is also the way to bring healing to our world…
Paul’s argument for ‘justification by faith’ is always an argument for multicultural community, and rarely about combatting works righteousness. When we accept our new identity in Christ, we accept each other as family. When we don’t eat with our family, it calls into question our identity; and the world looks on…
Really insightful analysis Steve. Reflecting on this after re-engaging with a little formational prayer and the underlying “core longings” – which include a deep sense of belonging, purpose, significance, acceptance and love – I think racism, class-ism and most other -ism’s are seeking to meet an unmet core longing in us in twisted ways twisting belonging and acceptance into boundary-monitoring and shallow distinctions…and perhaps I too often, like Qohelet, despair, “what is twisted cannot be made straight, and what is lacking cannot be accounted.” But with the advent of Jesus, empowerment to flip-the-script with the upside-down Kingdom of God is brought near. As insightful as the coupling of ‘-ism’s’ is (racism most often bundled with classism), I am profoundly struck by your “love your neighbor” and “love your enemy” way forward, which I think is really spot-on. It’s as simple and difficult as that…and for me, also reflecting on the passing of that enemy of apartheid Walter Wink, in so doing, we overcome evil with good and thereby tear down the wall of hostility. Our most peculiar problem is the endurance to not just take this to the cross, but to hang there ridiculed and mocked while the old dies as we hope for resurrection. I have also been reading Walter Brueggemann’s Cadences of Home, in which he proclaims (rightly IMO) that public witness is itself a post-modern form of preaching, and it is Witness that a secularized society needs in the public forum to rouse it from the delicate deceit of He-Who-Seek-to-Blind…
Steven,
How do you define public witness? Is this everyday action? Is it political protest? I am unfamiliar with the term.
yes, it’s both of those…it is intentional and sort-of-random as we live our lives like Jesus – interruptible to see what the Father’s up to and join in…
Here’s a great quote from theologian Richard Gaillardetz, which moves toward the holistic Kingdom-oriented, Christ-centered move toward public witness: ” Ultimately, the call to conversion may well lead us to great decisions fraught with moral weight. It may call us to end adulterous affairs, to cease embezzling, to put aside petty hatreds. It will undoubtedly lay claim to our political committments. It will call us to a life of compassion and justice. It will lead us to a renewed committment to care for our planet. But these weighty decisions will be the authentic fruit and maturation of conversion only to the extent that they confirm and develop the more minute tranformations realized within the interices between these great decisions. In short, it is when “nothing is happening” that we will work out our salvation. It is only when we allow our “dailiness” to be tranformed by the grace of God, that we will be able to enter into the graceful living to which people of every age have been called.”
I think public witness is just witness. Is there a such thing as a private witness?
Yes, I believe there is both public witness and private witness. Let’s clarify the terms: private means “pertaining to or affecting a particular person or small group of persons.” Public is “pertaining to or affecting a population or a community as whole.” Thus, what most churches do on Sunday is a private witness, what many people see as personal evangelism is indeed private. Public witness pertains to a population or a community as a whole, thus taking a prophetic and public stance with the poor or a marginalized community before the powers that be is a public witness. the Civil Rights movement was a public witness of the gospel of dignity for all people. The Occupy Wall Street movement was a public witness…it didn’t just happen in privatized space, it was in public. What do you think?
I do believe there is such a thing as private witness and a significant difference between the two. Let’s define our terms quickly. Private is “pertaining to or affecting a particular person or a small group of persons.” Public is “pertaining to or affecting a population or a community as a whole.” Most of what churches do on Sunday is private witness, in private space. Most of what the church talks about when it says evangelism, is personal, private witness. Now some of these personal ways of going about this can be done in a public setting (where strangers and wanders passing by might hear/see and stop and listen/look – which moves it toward a public witness but doesn’t quite get there. Let me explain what I mean. Public witness would pertain to or affect a population or a community as a whole. So when we take a prophetic stance and advocate for the poor or with a marginalized population before the powers-that-be, that’s public witness. The Civil Rights movement (led by the Black Church in America with people like MLK) was a public witness of the good news of dignity for all people. MLK’s “I have a dream” speech was an act of public witness. Gandhi’s movement (inspired by Jesus) against the British was a public witness. Can you see the distinction? What do you think?
I can definitely see a distinction and the examples you gave are on the money especially in a secular democracy such as ours.
In our day and age faith has been so privatized that I believe we in the church are aching for a public witness.
Also, have you all read this book: http://www.amazon.com/Injustice-Care-Souls-Oppression-Seriously/dp/0800662350/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1336744400&sr=8-1
It has two dozen essays discussing the realities of racism, sexism, ageism, ableism, and classism prevalent within the church and society and how to respond…
I will check out this resource Steve. Thanks for sharing. Sounds interesting.
[...] is a legacy. In part 2 Steve pointed to class discrimination being related to racism and a result of the legacy of racism. [...]